Will we be redefining ourselves as everyday citizens exercising and
trying to preserve our civil rights to pass along to our heirs?
Earlier
this week nearly 200 gun owners redefined ourselves as exercising and
preserving our civil rights to our county legislators and local media,
to protest the reinstitution of an old ammo registration law that had
been discredited and scrapped decades ago.
We explained most of us
had never done anything like this before, but we were there, because of
a long history of gun control based on ignorance, bigotry, and
prejudice against us.
Few of us were public speakers but we were
exercising our civil rights to freedom of speech, to peaceably
assemble, to petition our government for redress of grievances (all 1st
Amendment civil rights), and redefine our grievances.
We were
there in person to give them facts they did not seem to have, about
exercising our civil right to keep and bear arms and our ability to
pass that civil right on to our heirs, as undiminished as when it and
all our other civil rights were entrusted to us to pass along.
It is
hard for us to trust people to respect a civil right they have for 40
years argued it is not even an individual right, who perceive us as
ignorant, backwards and/or liars for, believing different. (Some of us
were labeled racists for suggesting more policing to deal with the
gangs, and better, maybe charter schools a better solution. Ending
racism and poverty being the preferred answer of bill advocates.)
It
is hard to trust representatives who prejudge us from their bigotries
because we 'cling' to older more traditional values, like the civil
rights, the birth rights enshrined in our Bill of Rights.
After our peaceful sidewalk protest we were banned from bringing our civil rights signs inside.
A
legislator who had been there for 15 years said she had not seen this
before, and addressed the crowd after checking it out. Appears there is
a law on the books prohibiting protest signs in NY courthouses, but it
hasn't been used locally in 15 maybe 20 years.
The previous and
smaller demonstration these same signs were allowed in, but there were
few cameras and again no written coverage of our civil rights argument
in the local press.
They have suddenly tabled the bill for a couple of months.
If they did not have to fear our arguments resonating with other constituents they would not have to censor us.
If they felt our arguments were foolish they would allow us to embarrass ourselves.
However it has always been very hard to win over a group who realizes members have legitimate civil rights grievances with you.
Either
we define ourselves and our adversaries or they do. They are busy
defining us but we have powerful and legitimate arguments they fear, if
we dare use them.
Submitted by Tom